Legal Opinion

Smith v. Butler

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 20, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is an action brought by ship’s husbands against a part owner to recover from him his share of disbursements made by the plaintiffs over and above the ship’s earnings. One of the plaintiffs, Smith, was also a part owner during the time of the disbursements, although he had sold his share before this action was brought. The disbursements were made in foreign commerce during a series of voyages, and covered whatever was necessary for the transaction of the business. Nothing more specific appears as to their nature. We understand from the report that there are other part owners not settled…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Worthington v. WaringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Berwin v. CableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Alderman v. NobleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Paine v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  4. McLauthlin v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  5. Ferem v. Olson & MahonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API