Legal Opinion

Berwin v. Cable

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 30, 1943PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

This is an action at law to recover one third of the profits of a joint undertaking. It is alleged in the first count of the declaration, which is the only count with which we are now concerned, that the plaintiff’s intestate, one Berwin, entered into an agreement with the defendants, Cable and Thomson, in accordance with which Berwin was to devote his time and efforts to secure from the United *432States government the sale to the defendants and himself of certain excess and surplus war material consisting of approximately two million pieces of underwear; that the underwear was to be purchased…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Holmes v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. McMurtrie v. GuilerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Rosenblum v. Springfield Produce Brokerage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Milbank v. J. C. Littlefield, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Chopelas v. ChopelasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Cardullo v. LandauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  2. Air Technology Corp. v. General Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  3. Mendelsohn v. Leather Manufacturing Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  4. Krokyn v. KrokynMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Lau v. Valu-Bilt Homes, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API