Legal Opinion

Ferem v. Olson & Mahony

California Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1917No. S. P. No. 7709PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Marcel E. Cerf and E. P. Shortall, Judges. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. '

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is an action in equity by the minority owners of the American schooner “Wm. F. Garms” against defendant corporation, the majority owner and the managing owner, for an accounting touching their respective partnership interests in the úse and operation of the vessel. It had made two voyages. Its third projected voyage was "from Puget Sound to Santa Rosalia, Mexico. When a few days out from its domestic port it encountered heavy weather, was disabled, and was towed back to a Puget Sound pprt by the Puget Sound Tugboat Company. Shortly thereafter this last company libeled the vessel and her…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Star of HopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Hendy v. MarchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Dukes v. KelloggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Carmona v. The Esteban de AntunanoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1887
  5. The AlpinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1884

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stilgenbaur v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  2. Davis v. California MotorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Dugan v. ForsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API