Murray v. Brazzel
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILSON, Justice.
Plaintiff-appellee Brazzel recovered judgment against Sid Murray, his wife and the Sid Murray Agency for over $200,000 actual and exemplary damages in a jury trial. The subject matter of the suit is Brazzel’s claim for agent’s renewal commissions, which he contends he is entitled to from his sale of insurance while a salesman for the Murray Agency, after termination of his employment.
Brazzel’s petition alleged three counts: (1) the breach of his 1948 written agency contract with the Murray Agency; (2) an action, as he says, “based upon promissory fraud or deceit arising…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ditto v. Ditto Investment CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Matthews v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1961
- Waldo v. Galveston H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Pacific Coast Engineering Co. v. Trinity Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. CokerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brazzel v. MurrayTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Dennis Weaver Chevrolet, Inc. v. ChadwickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- City of Willow Park v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Sudderth v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Freitas v. Twin City Fisherman's Cooperative Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.