Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Coker
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILSON, Justice.
Plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant for defamation, after a jury trial. He alleged defendant’s managers had circulated among its employees a list of names without title or caption stating that it was a “hot check list”; that it was reasonably understood by the employees, and intended to be understood, that the persons named on the list “had knowingly given hot checks with intent to defraud, in violation of Art. 567b, Texas Penal Code”, and had committed a crime; that the list included plaintiff’s name; that defendant knew the imputation was false and made it…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Guisti v. Galveston TribuneTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Ditto v. Ditto Investment CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Guisti v. Galveston TribuneTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Fancher v. CadwellTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- A. H. Belo & Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co. v. WherryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Murray v. BrazzelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Rose v. Enterprise Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Musser v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Musser v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985