Sudderth v. Howard
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Justice.
Homer Sudderth and his wife, Shirley Sudderth, initiated this litigation to (1) cancel their deed purportedly conveying their homestead to Freddie Howard and his wife, Billie L. Howard, and (2) recover statutory usury penalties from the Howards for the alleged usurious transaction. Based on a single jury finding that the deed, coupled with an option to repurchase, was not intended as a sale, the trial court rendered judgment cancelling the deed, decreeing that the Howards recover from the Sud-derths the amount of the recited purchase price with statutory interest, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wichita Falls & Oklahoma Railway Co. v. PepperTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Texas Land & Loan Co. v. BlalockTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Texas Co. v. State & Duval County Ranch Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1955
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. CrossTexas Supreme Court · 1973
- Rich v. Walker Smith Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Methodist Hospitals of Dallas v. Corporate Communicators, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Johnson v. CherryTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Freedman v. Briarcroft Property Owners, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Pope v. DarceyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Allright, Inc. v. Pearson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.