Legal Opinion
Employees' Retirement System v. Ho
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided March 25, 1960No. 4178PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
MARUMOTO, J., IN WHICH WIRTZ, J., JOINS.
Employees’ Retirement System of the State of Hawaii, plaintiff, and Raymond Y. 0. Ho, Director of Budget, *155State of Hawaii, defendant, are parties to a question in difference and have submitted the question to this court on agreed facts under R.L.H. 1955, c. 22Z.
Plaintiff is a public agency, having the powers and privileges of a corporation, and is the holder of $29,000 of general obligation bonds issued by the Territory of Hawaii. Defendant is the State officer who, with the approval of the governor, is authorized to issue general obligation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bain Peanut Co. of Tex. v. PinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Ketchum v. . the City of Buffalo and AustinNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- City of Tulsa v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Succession of BoyterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- State v. RodriguesHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- Convention Center Authority v. AnzaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646 v. YogiHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. ElliottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.