Legal Opinion

Ketchum v. . the City of Buffalo and Austin

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1856PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The first question presented by this case is, whether the city of Buffalo had power in December, 1853, to purchase land for the purpose of a market. It is now well settled that corporations, being merely artificial persons, derive all their powers from the law which creates them, or from some other positive statute. A natural person…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCullough v. MossCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1846
  2. Mott v. HicksNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  3. Attorney General v. Life & Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Chancery · 1842

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Peterson v. . the Mayor, C., of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Courtesy Sandwich Shop, Inc. v. Port of New York AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. In Re the Estate of HeinzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. City of Long Beach v. LisenbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Sebastian Shaumyan and Maria Shaumyan v. Sidetex Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API