Legal Opinion

Gibbs v. Kimbrell

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 15, 1993No. 1968PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

Wayne T. and Peggy J. Kimbrell appeal from an order requiring them to remove a shed from their property because its location violates their residential subdivision’s covenants and restrictions, and enjoining them from future violation of these covenants and restrictions. We affirm as modified.

Diamond Point, a residential subdivision of approximately 45 lots, is subject to covenants and restrictions (“covenants”) which were recorded in 1974. In 1976, the respondents, A. Hugh and Mary Settle Gibbs, purchased lots 13,14, and 15 in the subdivision. These lots are contiguous and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Frady v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. Lyon v. Columbia Water Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  4. Hamilton v. CCM, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  5. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. PorterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Queen's Grant II Horizontal Property Regime v. Greenwood Development Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Provident Life & Accident Insurance v. DriverCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Mazloom v. MazloomCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Kneale v. BondsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Siau v. KasselCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API