Legal Opinion

Kneale v. Bonds

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 12, 1994No. 2280PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

This suit in equity was instituted by several property owners (property owners) within the Anchor Point Horizontal Property Regime against Henry Earl Bonds and Janet Bonds, also owners of a condo unit within Anchor Point, seeking a mandatory injunction restraining the Bonds from proceeding with the erection of a 2,200-square-foot addition to their condominium unit being built over a portion of the general common elements of Anchor Point. Alleging that the property owners had also encroached upon the general common and limited common elements, the Bonds claimed the property…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Janasik v. Fairway Oaks Villas Horizontal Property RegimeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. SEA PINES PLANTATION COMPANY v. WellsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Hunnicutt v. RickenbackerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  4. Holling v. MargiottaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  5. Gibbs v. KimbrellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cedar Cove Homeowners Ass'n v. DiPietroCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Richland County v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Seabrook Island Property Owners Ass'n v. Marshland Trust, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Cedar Cove Homeowners Ass'n v. DiPietroCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API