Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Lyon v. Columbia Water Power Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 4, 1909No. 7113PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Petition in the original jurisdiction of this Court by Hon. J. Fraser Lyon, Attorney-General, on behalf of the State, against the Columbia Water Power Company, the •Columbia Electric Street Railway, Light and Power Company, and the City of Columbia, to enjoin the City of Columbia from building a bridge across the Columbia Canal.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The Attorney-General by his petition, filed in behalf of the State, alleging the Columbia Canal to be navigable water of the State, asked this Court to require the respondents, the Columbia Water Power Company, the Columbia Electric Street Railway, Light and Power Company, and the City of Columbia, to show cause why they should not be enjoined from continuing the construction of a bridge across the canal, and why they should not be required to move all obstructions at the entrance of the canal. At the hearing, when the defendants had…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. The MontelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Lamprey v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. City of Georgetown v. THE ALEXANDRIA CANAL COMPANY, &C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1838

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Heyward v. LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. United Geophysical Co. v. VelaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  3. Peden v. Furman UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  4. State v. FraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. Strong v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API