Legal Opinion

State v. Coffman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 4, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Keokuk District Court. — IIon. John T. Scott, Judge. The defendant was convicted of the crime of seduction, and appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Sherwin, J.-

1 The seventh paragraph of the court’s charge to the jury is as follows: “(7) Even though the defendant had sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix, as by her claimed, and she was at the time of previously chaste character, yet, unless she yielded her person to the defendant by reason of some art, promise, or deception practiced upon her by him, there can be no conviction ; but the kind and character of these; however, are not so important as the effect they may and did have upon her mind, if any; nor is it important as to the manner in which her ruin was accomplished. If the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. McClinticSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  3. State v. HamannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. State v. McGinnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BlackburnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. State v. TerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. State v. HectorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  4. State v. DolanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. State v. CotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API