State v. Hamann
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal, from Lyon District Court. — Hon. William Hutchinson, Judge. The defendant was convicted of tbe crime of seduction, and judgment of imprisonment rendered against bim, from which, he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGiven, J.
I. One ground of defendant’s motion for a new trial was that, for the reasons stated in the motion, the court erred in giving the part of the second instruction set 1 out; ■ and the overruling of the motion on this ground is assigned as error. It is claimed on behalf of the state that, as no exception was taken to the instruction, the error assigned cannot be considered; and State v. Hathaway, 100 Iowa, 225, is cited. In that case the complaint was of an omission to instruct, and no instruction was asked on the subject omitted. In the motion for a new trial it was said, “The court erred in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. HathawaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Baird v. BoehnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Hawn v. BanghartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Breiner v. NugentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Young v. CorriganDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1912
- State v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.