State v. McClintic
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Henry District Court■ — Hon. A. H. Stutsman, Judge. Indictment foe seduction. Trial by jury. Yerdict guilty, and judgment. The defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSeevees, J.
1. sEDDcxiotf roboratfonof" prosecutrix. I. The prosecuting witness testified that she was an unmarried woman, and that the defendant promised to man7 I161') aQd thereby accomplished her seduction; that the seduction took place on the 27th day of January, 188é, and as to this time she was quite positive. She also testified that defendant had visited and sought her company frequently, during a period of two years or more, at her father’s house, and at her brother’s and brother-in-law’s; that on such occasions she and the defendant were alone the greater part of the night. The evidence of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. BaldoserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- State v. ReinheimerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- State v. McCumberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- People v. . KearneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.