Legal Opinion

State v. McGinn

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 12, 1899PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Moivroe District Court. — IIon. F. W. Eiciiel-berger, Judge. IkdictmeNT for seduction. Trial to jury. Verdict and judgment of guilty. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWaterman, J.

Defendant, on tbe day set for tbe trial made application for a continuance over tbe term, on tbe ground tbat a material witness subpoenaed by bim bad 1 refused to respond. We may concede tbe diligence of defendant in attempting to secure tbe presence of tbis witness, and also the materiality of tbe evidence sought to be obtained, but we do> not think it is made to appear tbat tbe witness’ presence could be secured by ordinary methods at the ensuing term. He bad disobeyed a subpoena once, and there was no reason to think tbat be would come at any time without compulsion. Defendant should havei…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. LenihanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  2. State v. KingsleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1874

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. EgbertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Mott v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. TerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Boling v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State v. NugentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API