Legal Opinion
Ricketts v. Board of Accountancy
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 8, 2002No. 48347-1-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.
On the thirtieth and final day to seek judicial review of a Washington State Board of Accountancy disciplinary ruling, Karis Ricketts filed a petition for review in superior court. That same day, she also deposited in the mail copies of the petition to the Board and its attorney of record. The superior court dismissed Ricketts’ petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because service was perfected as required by the Administrative Procedures Act, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS
On July 27, 2000, the Washington State Board of Accountancy served a final order…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Fray ex rel. Fray v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Fray v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Ianicelli v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Diehl v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Diehl v. WESTERN WASH. GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BOARDWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Diehl v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Diehl v. GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BD.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- In Re the License Application of Botany Unlimited Design & Supply, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.