Legal Opinion
Diehl v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 2, 2003No. 29101-1-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.
John E. Diehl appeals the dismissal of his appeal from a decision of the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board (Board). The Mason County *215Superior Court ruled that Diehl failed to comply with the service of process requirements in CR 4. We conclude that (1) CR 4 applies; (2) the county did not waive its challenge to service of process; and (3) substantial compliance is not applicable to Administrative Procedure Act (APA), chapter 34.05 RCW, service of process requirements. Thus, we affirm.
FACTS
Diehl and others petitioned the Board for an order requiring Mason County to comply…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Skagit Surveyors v. FRIENDS OF SKAGITWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Skagit Surveyors & Engineers, LLC v. Friends of Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re SaltisWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Thurston County v. Cooper Point Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Union Bay Preservation Coalition v. Cosmos Development & Administration Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Quality Rock Products, Inc. v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Quality Rock Products, Inc. v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Diehl v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Diehl v. WESTERN WASH. GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BOARDWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Diehl v. GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BD.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.