Legal Opinion
New Colt Holding Corp. v. RJG Holdings of Florida, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 29, 2004No. 3:02CV173 (PCD)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DORSEY, District Judge.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, Plaintiffs and Defendants have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs’ Motion [Doc. No. 157] is granted in part, denied in part and Defendants’ Motion [Doc. No. 144] is granted in part, denied in part. Additionally, Defendants’ Motions to Strike [Doc. Nos. 186 and 193] are denied.
I. BACKGROUND:
Plaintiffs New Colt Holding Corporation and Colt’s Manufacturing Company, Inc. brought this action against RJG Holdings of Florida, Inc f/k/a American Western Arms…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Christian Louboutin S.A. v. Yves Saint Laurent America Holding, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- LVL XIII Brands, Inc. v. Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- R.F.M.A.S., Inc. v. Mimi SoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Cartier, Inc. v. Four Star Jewelry Creations, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. De C.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.