Legal Opinion

Scott v. Pacific Power & Light Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1934No. 24987. Department OnePublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

This action was instituted to recover •from defendant corporation and its manager for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff as the result of his bringing an iron pole, which he was removing from the roof of a building in Yakima, into contact with, or near to, a high-voltage distributing electric line of defendant corporation. From judgment entered on the verdict in favor of plaintiff, motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial having been denied, the defendants appealed.

Respondent was employed by the Liberty Theatre Company, of Yakima, two days a week as a…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. McQuillan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Geismann v. Missouri-Edison Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  4. Giraude v. Elec. Improvement Co. of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. McLaughlin v. Louisville Electric Light Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Richardson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Gordon v. Deer Park School District No. 414Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Richardson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Morris v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Vannoy v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1962

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API