Legal Opinion
Marryshow v. Town of Bladensburg
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 31, 1991No. Civ. A. No. MJG-90-1470PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON MOTION FOR BIFURCATION
GARBIS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Derek Marryshow, alleges that on June 10, 1989 three officers of the Bladensburg, Maryland Police Department (James Flynn, Matthew Rhomba, and Robert Cowling, the “active Defendants”), violated his constitutional rights and committed State law torts against him by arresting him without a valid reason to do so and by using excessive force in making the arrest. Plaintiff sues the active Defendants for violation of 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and for the state law torts of false arrest and assault and battery. Plaintiff has also sued…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Spell v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Sharon Temkin Bruce M. Temkin v. Frederick County Commissioners Glen Marion Selby, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Dawson v. Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1995
- Gray v. MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Gonzalez v. Cecil County, MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Robertson v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MDDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Swagler v. SheridanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.