Legal Opinion

Swagler v. Sheridan

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided July 12, 2011No. Civil Action No. RDB-08-2289PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge.

On September 3, 2008, Plaintiffs Angela Swagler and Elizabeth Walsh (the “Swa*514gler Plaintiffs”) filed the present action asserting numerous constitutional and common law claims relating to a dispersal order, and subsequent arrest, search, and detainment that occurred after the Plaintiffs participated in a pro life demonstration on August 1, 2008, in Harford County Maryland. The named Defendants in that case include Terrence Sheridan, Charles Neighoff, Dona Bohlen, Walter Rasinski, and Christopher Bradley, all current or former employees of…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ross v. EarlyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
  2. Crystal Allman and Gary Allman v. Shenandoah Valley Social Services, et al.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2026
  3. Gaddis v. HarrisonDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
  4. Hulbert v. PopeDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
  5. Telep v. StickneyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API