Wagoner v. Douglas Battery Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
Plaintiff presents eight issues for review, all which question whether the Commission’s findings of fact were supported by competent evidence from the record, and whether its conclusions of law were supported by the findings of fact. In his questions presented, plaintiff has enunciated the two-prong standard of review we must follow on appeal from an opinion and award of the Industrial Commission. Barham v. Food World, 300 N.C. 329, 266 S.E. 2d 676 (1980); Murray v. Biggerstaff, 81 N.C. App. 377, 344 S.E. 2d 550 (1986).
Plaintiff primarily challenges the findings of fact…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barham v. Food World, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Porterfield v. RPC CORP.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Mayo v. City of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Carroll v. Burlington IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Murray v. BiggerstaffCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- Openshaw v. Buxton ClinicNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1997
- Pierce v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Pierce v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Price v. napce/phillips Consumer ElectronicsNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1996