Legal Opinion

Shorter v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Co.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided March 25, 2003No. 02-2009 D/BREPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DONALD, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Memphis Light, Gas, & Water Company (“MLG & W”)’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff Leo Shorter (“Shorter”) asserts claims for discrimination based on race, hostile work environment/racial harassment, and retaliation, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. In support of the motion for summary judgment, Defendant argues that 1) claims premised upon discrete acts occurring more than 300 days prior to the filing of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moling v. O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2011
  2. Pleasants v. AllbaughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API