Shorter v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Co.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DONALD, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Memphis Light, Gas, & Water Company (“MLG & W”)’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff Leo Shorter (“Shorter”) asserts claims for discrimination based on race, hostile work environment/racial harassment, and retaliation, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. In support of the motion for summary judgment, Defendant argues that 1) claims premised upon discrete acts occurring more than 300 days prior to the filing of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moling v. O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2011
- Pleasants v. AllbaughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003