Legal Opinion

Moling v. O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided January 13, 2011No. 09-1100PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

J. DANIEL BREEN, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The Plaintiff, Rhonda Moling, initially brought this action against the Defendant, O’Reilly Automotive, Inc. (“O’Reilly”), in the Circuit Court for the Twenty-Sixth Judicial District at Jackson, Tennessee on March 16, 2009, alleging sexual harassment, discrimination on the basis of gender, and retaliation in violation of the Tennessee Human Rights Act, Tennessee Code Annotated § 4-21-101, et seq. (“THRA”). The matter was removed to this Court on April 24, 2009 on diversity of citizenship…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. Shelby CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2011
  2. Norman v. ROLLING HILLS HOSPITAL, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2011
  3. Hawkins v. Center for Spinal SurgeryDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2014
  4. Foust v. Metropolitan Security Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2011
  5. Boges v. General Motors Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API