Brooke Et Ux v. Amuchastegui Et Ux
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
The parties own adjoining residential properties in the city of Portland. Each tract constitutes part of Lots 9 and 10 in Block 22 of the First Addition to Holladay Park Addition in said city. Each of said lots as platted were 100 x 50 feet, with 50 feet fronting on the north side of northeast Clackamas Street, and with their northerly 50 feet abutting the south line of an alley running east and west through the center of Block 22. The westerly boundary of Lot 10 coincides for a distance of 100 feet with the easterly line of northeast 26th Avenue.
In 1926 the two lots were owned by Mary C.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Norgard v. Busher Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Winn v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Birks v. East Side Transfer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Monese v. StruveOregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Emrich v. EMERYOregon Supreme Court · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Bend Millwork Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Wiley v. BergOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Alldrin v. LucasOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Shumate v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.