Legal Opinion

Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. Marshall

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 16, 1931No. 9156PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MeNARY, District Judge.

This is an action in equity to review an award of the deputy commissioner for the Fourteenth district, under the Act of Congress of March 4, 1937, known as the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (33 USCA §§ 901-950), and is here upon a motion to dismiss.

On the 4th day of May, 1929, the claimant was an employee of the complainant on board a barge in the harbor at the city of Portland, Or., and while so employed sustained an injury resulting in his disability.

During the year immediately preceding the injury the claimant had been engaged 153 days or parts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Claim of Littler v. George A. Fuller Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Andrejwski v. Wolverine Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Claim of La Mont Prentice v. New York State RailwaysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  4. Mahaffey v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Gunther v. United States Employees' Compensation CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Branham v. Terminal Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. LawsonDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1932
  3. Pacific S. S. Co. v. PillsburyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1931
  4. Case v. PillsburyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API