Legal Opinion
Pacific S. S. Co. v. Pillsbury
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 26, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COSGRAVE, District Judge.
The bill of complaint in this action seeks suspension and setting aside of the order of Warren H. Pillsbury, deputy commissioner of the Thirteenth compensation district under the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (44 Stat. 1424, 33 USCA § 901 et seq.), wherein the deputy commissioner awarded to V. H. Hammer compensation for injury suffered while working as a stevedore on board a lighter then alongside one of the plaintiff’s.ships at the port of San Diego. Compensation was awarded at the rate of $25 a week under section 10 of the act (33 USCA § 910).
Cl…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Andrew F. Mahony Co. v. MarshallDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1931
- Charles Nelson Co. v. PillsburyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1931
- Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. MarshallDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1931
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tri-State Terminals, Inc. v. JesseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Lumbermen's Mut. Casualty Co. v. LoweDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1933
- Tri-State Terminals, Inc. And Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Fred Jesse and Benefits Review Board, United States Department of Labor, and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Tri-State Terminals, Inc. And Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. George Barber and Benefits Review Board, United States Department of Labor, and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Chausse v. LoweDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1938