Legal Opinion
Case v. Pillsbury
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 21, 1943No. 23795-GPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, District Judge.
This is a libel for review of a compensation order and for injunction suspending and setting aside an award under Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 44 Stat. 1424, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq. and involves construction of the compensation provisions of the Act. (33 U.S.C.A. § 908).
Respondent Young lost the sight of his right eye because of the entry of a foreign body therein while employed on board ship. Respondent Pillsbury, Deputy Commissioner of the United States Employees’ Compensation Commission, awarded compensation for permanent partial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Baltimore & Phila. Steamboat Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- De Wald v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Marshall v. Andrew F. Mahony Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Travelers Ins. Co. v. BranhamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. VaccariniSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953
- Voris v. EikelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Voris v. EikelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952