Legal Opinion

Claim of La Mont Prentice v. New York State Railways

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 28, 1917PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, New York State Railways, from an award of the State Industrial Commission, entered in the office of said Commission on the 15th day of November, 1915.

1Opinion of the Court

Cochrane, J.:

This appeal involves the proper application of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 67; Laws of 1914, chap. 41), in a case where the claimant, has worked seven days a week for practically an entire year before the accident. The section provides methods for determining the average annual earnings and the average weekly wages as a basis upon which to compute the compensation. Subdivisions 1 and 2 of the section provide that in cases included within such subdivisions the average annual earnings shall consist of 300 times the average daily wage or salary.…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Road Commission v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Andrew F. Mahony Co. v. MarshallDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1931
  3. Gruber v. Kramer Amusement Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  4. Oklahoma City v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API