Legal Opinion
Ronald C. Brown v. Hot, Sexy and Safer Productions, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 23, 1995No. 95-1275PublishedCited by 340 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Chief Judge.
The plaintiffs are two minors and their parents. The minors allege that they were compelled to attend an indecent AIDS and sex education program conducted at their public high school by defendant Hot, Sexy and Safer Productions (“Hot, Sexy, and Safer”). Plaintiffs allege, inter alia, that the compelled attendance deprived the minors of their privacy rights and their right to an educational environment free from sexual harassment. The district court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
The…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by340 opinions
- Patricia A. Brooks v. City of San Mateo, a Municipal Order and Corporation San Mateo Police Department John Stangl, Chief of Police Steven SelvaggioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Aversa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Charles Mack v. Warden Loretto FCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Civil Liberties for Urban Believers, Christ Center, Christian Covenant Outreach Church v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Littlefield v. Forney Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
335 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.