Legal Opinion
Stillwagon v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 5, 1908No. 63PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
CROSS, District Judge.
The writ of error in this case before this court for review the following order of the Circuit Court:
“And now, to wit, April 17, 1907, Thomas M. & Rody P. Marshall, attorneys for the plaintiff above, Charles E. Stillwagon, having made a motion for leave to file an amended petition in the above case, leave to file the same is hereby refused.”
An exception was duly allowed and sealed to the entry of the above order. The record, however, discloses no assignment or assignments of error whatever. A rule of this court requires the filing,- upon application for a writ of error,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chapman v. BarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Mexican Central Railway Co. v. PinkneySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Philip Schneider Brewing Co. v. American Ice-Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Chapman v. Yellow Poplar Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1898
- Dunn v. Mayo MillsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Iowa State BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Werner v. ZintmasterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
- Western Coal & Mining Co. v. McCallumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Hancock Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Hancock Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940