Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hancock Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 28, 1940No. 9530Published

1DissentMathews, Circuit Judge

Obviously, the order appealed from was not a final decision and hence was not‘appealable under § 128(a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 225(a). Stillwagon v. Baltimore & Ohio Ry. Co., 3 Cir., 159 F. 97; J. W. Darling Lumber Co. v. Porter, 5 Cir., 256 F. 455; Kulesza v. Blair, 7 Cir., 41 F.2d 439; Pioneer Grain Corp. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co., 8 Cir., 42 F.2d 1009; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Overman Cushion Tire Co., 6 Cir., 66 F.2d 81; Werner v. Zintmaster, 3 Cir., 77 F.2d 74.

Appellant concedes that the order was not appealable under § 128(a), but contends that it was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Overman Cushion Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  3. J. W. Darling Lumber Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919
  4. In-A-Floor Safe Co. v. Diebold Safe & Lock Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  5. Werner v. ZintmasterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API