Hancock Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentMathews, Circuit Judge
Obviously, the order appealed from was not a final decision and hence was not‘appealable under § 128(a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 225(a). Stillwagon v. Baltimore & Ohio Ry. Co., 3 Cir., 159 F. 97; J. W. Darling Lumber Co. v. Porter, 5 Cir., 256 F. 455; Kulesza v. Blair, 7 Cir., 41 F.2d 439; Pioneer Grain Corp. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co., 8 Cir., 42 F.2d 1009; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Overman Cushion Tire Co., 6 Cir., 66 F.2d 81; Werner v. Zintmaster, 3 Cir., 77 F.2d 74.
Appellant concedes that the order was not appealable under § 128(a), but contends that it was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Overman Cushion Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- J. W. Darling Lumber Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919
- In-A-Floor Safe Co. v. Diebold Safe & Lock Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Werner v. ZintmasterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.