Philip Schneider Brewing Co. v. American Ice-Mach. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. This was an action brought in tlie United States circuit court for the district of Colorado by the American Ice-Machine Company, the defendant in error, against the Philip Schneider Brewing Company, tlie plaintiff in error, to recover the balance of die purchase price of an ice-making machine, and the value of certain gooiI*:, vares, and merchandise.
Read the full summary
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. This was an action brought in tlie United States circuit court for the district of Colorado by the American Ice-Machine Company, the defendant in error, against the Philip Schneider Brewing Company, tlie plaintiff in error, to recover the balance of die purchase price of an ice-making machine, and the value of certain gooiI*:, vares, and merchandise. The complaint divides the plaintiff’s claim into three canses of action, which are separately stated. The fust is founded on a contract for an ice machine purchased…
1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, Circuit Judge
The second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, ninth, tenth, and eleventh assignments of error rest on the ruling of the circuit court in sustaining objections to interrogatories propounded to the witnesses by the plaintiff in error, intended to elicit the witnesses’ opinions or knowledge as to whether there were any defects in the engine and the ammonia compressor. The objection to these questions was sustained by the circuit court on the ground that the defendant, in its answer, pointed out specially the particular parts of the ice machine which it alleged were defective, and that these…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chapman v. BarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- MINOR v. the Mechanics Bank of AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hamilton v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Mobile & Montgomery Railway Co. v. JureySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lesser Cotton Co. v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Board of Com'rs v. SutliffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Lange v. Union Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Pacific S. S. Co. v. SuttonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Travelers Mut. Casualty Co. v. RectorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.