King v. White
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Birmingham City Court. Tried before Hon. Wm. W. Wilkerson. This action was brought by the appellant, R. L. King, against the appellees, James N. White and Marion N. George. The case made by the complaint is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Birmingham City Court. Tried before Hon. Wm. W. Wilkerson. This action was brought by the appellant, R. L. King, against the appellees, James N. White and Marion N. George. The case made by the complaint is sufficiently stated in the opinion. To the complaint, the defendant demurred upon the following grounds: “1. No facts are stated which justify the conclusion of wrong on the part of the defendants.- 2. It is no wrong for the patentee of an invention’engaged in selling to buyers the rights to manufacture and sell said patented article to conspire and agree together' with another…
1Opinion of the CourtBrickell, C. J.
This was an action on the case instituted by appellant to recover for damages alleged to have resulted from a deceit and fraud' practiced upon him by appellees in the sale of a_ right to vend in the State of Georgia a cértain patented lock, of which defendant George was the patentee. Demurrers specifying many objections to the complaint Avere interposed by the defendant and sustained by the court, and plaintiff ■ declining to amend, judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant, from which plaintiff appeals, assigning as error the judgment of .the court sustaining the demurrers. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Grant v. HardyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by13 opinions
- Menefee v. OxnamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Cerny v. Paxton & Gallagher Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1907
- Wall v. GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Reyer v. BlaisdellColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
- Faust v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.