Huling v. Seccombe
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (B. L.), J., pro tem.
-This is an appeal from a decree quieting title to a certain lot situated in Long Beach, California. Appellant contends that the findings and judgment are not supported by the evidence.
Much of the evidence was stipulated. The respective parties claim title through a common ancestor. The in question is an unimproved vacant lot in a suburb of Long Beach, which has never been used, inclosed, or cultivated. It was without buildings, fences, or street improvements. The only evidence tending to show adverse possession on the part of respondent or his predecessor in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Learned v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Secret Valley Land Co. v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Los Angeles & Arizona Land Co. v. MarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Bateman v. KelloggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- West v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Turner v. MilsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Norman v. SmedleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Spencer v. Harmon Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Wood v. DavidsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.