Legal Opinion

Lorch v. Kentucky Home Mut. Life Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 20, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Fulton

Affirming.

The appellant, H. R. Lorcb, was for many years a general agent of tbe Inter-Southern Life Insurance Company and by his agency contract would, at the time of filing of this action, have been entitled to receive renewal commissions from the Inter-Southern aggregating $3,343, if it had then been a going concern, provided he had not at that time forfeited his right to receive renewal commissions by accepting employment as agent by another insurance company. The agency contract provided that appellant should forfeit his right to receive further renewal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chase v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Barton v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  3. General American Life Ins. Co. v. RoachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Sutherland v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Bohrnstedt v. Travelers' InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buskuhl v. Family Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Ekman v. United Film Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Ekman v. United Film Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API