Legal Opinion

Barton v. Travelers Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 18, 1909No. 7373PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Before Klugh, J., Greenville, Action by W. A. Barton against Travelers Insurance Co. The decree on circuit is: “On February 11, 1889, the plaintiff herein entered into a contract with the defendant by which he undertook to serve the defendant as district agent at Greenville, S. C., in soliciting life and accident insurance and in other matters connected with such agency.

Read the full summary

Before Klugh, J., Greenville, Action by W. A. Barton against Travelers Insurance Co. The decree on circuit is: “On February 11, 1889, the plaintiff herein entered into a contract with the defendant by which he undertook to serve the defendant as district agent at Greenville, S. C., in soliciting life and accident insurance and in other matters connected with such agency. He was to receive as compensation for his services commissions at fixed rates on first annual premiums of both life and accident policies, and at less rates on renewals or annual premiums for subsequent years. Section 13 of…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydricic.

This Court concurs in the opinion of the Circuit Judge, and, for the reasons therein stated, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. The Rochester Corporation v. W. L. Rochester, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  2. Almers v. South Carolina National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  3. Masden v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  4. Chicago Life Ins. v. TiernanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  5. Buskuhl v. Family Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API