Legal Opinion

Bohrnstedt v. Travelers' Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1927PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action to recover commissions on renewal premiums under an agency contract into which plaintiff and defendant insurance company entered on March 24, 1917. The contract continued in effect until June 8, 1921, when it was terminated by the defendant. The controversy arose over the payment .of commission upon renewal premiums which accrued and were paid within four years after the termination of the contract. The agreement, in part, provides:

“(7) If the agent shall neglect to report and pay over premiums collected by him as provided herein, or shall otherwise violate any of the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Coit v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Anderson v. Farm Bur. Mut. Ins. Co. of IdahoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Masden v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  4. Bradford v. BillingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
  5. Johnson v. Country Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API