Legal Opinion

Mack v. Hendricks

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

Plaintiff brought this suit to collect a promissory note given for the sum of $1,500 dated January 5, 1918, and due 90 days after date, with interest from date until paid, and for reasonable attorney’s fees in case of suit or action, executed by defendant in favor of B>. N. Stanfield, and to foreclose a pledge of certain shares of stock given as security for the payment of the note. It is alleged the note and pledged shares of stock were indorsed, transferred and delivered by Stanfield to plaintiff. Five hundred dollars was credited upon the note on three different dates.

In November, 1924,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stamm v. WoodOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Findley v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Owen v. LeberOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Eastham v. Telegram Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Prince v. DierksOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Hunsiker v. GantenbeinOregon Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API