Legal Opinion

Prince v. Dierks

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1966PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWAB, J. (Pro Tempore).

This is a suit for strict foreclosure of a contract for the purchase of a dairy farm. Plaintiffs sold to Mr. and Mrs. Dierks who in turn assigned to Mr. and Mrs. Thompson. The Thompsons assigned to Barker who took possession. Barker, as security for a loan of money, assigned to the defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Schmidt. The contract contained a provision forbidding assignments without written consent of the sellers. Plaintiffs contend that the assignment from the Thompsons to Barker and the subsequent assignment from Barker to the Schmidts was without their oral or written…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. GrantOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hubbard v. Olsen-Roe Transfer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Dickerson v. MurfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. North v. Union Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Atkochunas v. GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gratreak v. North Pacific Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. Roth Development, Inc. v. A. R. John General Contractors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Miller v. FernleyOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Greulich v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. Gratreak v. North Pacific Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API