Legal Opinion

Eastham v. Telegram Publishing Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

Error is not assigned relative to the order striking certain parts of the original complaint, nor does appellant discuss such matter in his brief. Therefore, we might well pass that phase of the case. If the court had improperly allowed the motion to strike, the point was waived upon the filing of an amended complaint. Had plaintiff elected to stand upon his original complaint, upon appeal from any judgment or final order rendered against him, the action of the trial court in striking the matter from the initial pleading would have been reviewed. This rule of practice was followed in Everding…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McClung v. McPhersonOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Stamm v. WoodOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Farris v. HayesOregon Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Balfour, Guthrie & Co. v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Campbell v. FriedlanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Dunmire Motor Co. v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Greulich v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. Mack v. HendricksOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Hunsiker v. GantenbeinOregon Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API