Legal Opinion

Owen v. Leber

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1924PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

In plaintiffs’ statement of their case, they say that this suit is brought for the purpose of seeking relief as follows: The cancellation of two certain deeds; the cancellation of a contract for the sale and purchase of timber; the recovery of $500 damages for the breach of their timber contract; the exclusion of all right of Edgar Hannan under the above-mentioned deeds and contract, and the recovery of costs and disbursements of this suit.

Under the court’s decree, the plaintiffs secured, in part, the relief sought by them. The deeds conveying to R. E. Leber the timber upon certain lands were…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Taylor v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Willis v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Currie v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Hancock v. LukeUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Bowles v. DobleOregon Supreme Court · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McGrath v. Electrical Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Smith v. ABELOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Spencer v. WolffOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Dant & Russell, Inc. v. PierceOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Houston v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API