Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Murphy

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 24, 1987No. 22775PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Acting Associate Justice:

These two cases, consolidated for appeal, involve the issue of whether the General Assembly’s repeal of S. C. Code Ann. § 15-77-210 et seq. (1976) extinguished appellants’ tort claims against the City of Columbia. In both cases, the circuit court held it did. We agree and affirm.

FACTS

In the first case, appellant Taylor was involved in a three-car collision on May 23,1985. One of the vehicles was owned by respondent City of Columbia (City). Respondent Murphy, an employee of City, was the driver. Taylor filed an action for personal injuries in November 1985.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. McGlohon v. HarlanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  3. Cope v. Hampton CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1894

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Wright Ex Rel. Green v. Colleton County School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  3. Oxford Finance Companies, Inc. v. BurgessSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Simmons Ex Rel. Estate of Anderson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Hazel v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API