Legal Opinion

United States v. Manuel Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 16, 1970No. 24897PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

Gonzales was convicted by a jury for violation of 21 U.S.C. § 176a, conspiring to smuggle marihuana into the United States. Following sentence, he appeals.

Gonzales claims that § 176a violates his constitutional privilege against self-incrimination. No record was made below to support this claim.

Section 176a, in prohibiting smuggling marihuana into the United States, does not violate a defendant’s privilege against self-incriminaton. Witt v. United States, (9 Cir. 1969) 413 F.2d 303; McClain v. United States, (9 Cir. 1969) 417 F.2d 489; United States v. Scott, (9 Cir. 1970) 425 F.2d 55;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Phillip Andrew ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Ouida J. Weissinger A/K/A Ouida Boyd and Mrs. George Boyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Carl Gregory Witt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. John T. McClain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. Paul Edward SimonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. United States v. Dan CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Herbert Marvin FeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Julio HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Arthur SuttonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API