United States v. Manuel Gonzales
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Gonzales was convicted by a jury for violation of 21 U.S.C. § 176a, conspiring to smuggle marihuana into the United States. Following sentence, he appeals.
Gonzales claims that § 176a violates his constitutional privilege against self-incrimination. No record was made below to support this claim.
Section 176a, in prohibiting smuggling marihuana into the United States, does not violate a defendant’s privilege against self-incriminaton. Witt v. United States, (9 Cir. 1969) 413 F.2d 303; McClain v. United States, (9 Cir. 1969) 417 F.2d 489; United States v. Scott, (9 Cir. 1970) 425 F.2d 55;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Phillip Andrew ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Ouida J. Weissinger A/K/A Ouida Boyd and Mrs. George Boyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Carl Gregory Witt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- John T. McClain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Paul Edward SimonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- United States v. Dan CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Herbert Marvin FeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Julio HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Arthur SuttonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.