Legal Opinion

United States v. Phillip Andrew Scott

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 6, 1970No. 23119_1PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Scott appeals from his conviction for a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 176a.1 Scott, along with two codefend*57ants, was indicted on January 31, 1968, upon a charge that on October 26, 1967, he and his eodefendants had “knowingly received, concealed and facilitated the transportation and concealment” of marihuana that they knew “theretofore had been imported and brought into the United States contrary to law.” A jury found that appellant and his codefendant Walker were guilty as charged; a mistrial was declared as to codefendant Rico.

Scott contends that: (1) the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Kornahrens v. EvattCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Anthony J. Demma, United States of America v. Henry BrulayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Billy G. ByersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  4. The People of the Territory of Guam v. Jae Hung YangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Darlina K. FranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API