Board of Medical Examiners v. Eisen
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Burnett. This is an action in the matter of the revocation of the license of William Eisen.
Read the full summary
From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Burnett. This is an action in the matter of the revocation of the license of William Eisen. The facts are as follows: On December 22, 1910, there was filed with the State Board of Medical Examiners a complaint reading thus: “William Eisen is accused by Ben L. Norden, by this complaint, with unprofessional and dishonorable conduct, committed as follows: That the said William Eisen did, on or about the 13th day of October, 1910, in the county of Multnomah and State of Oregon, then and there being, wrongfully and unlawfully…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett
1. The State Board of Medical Examiners has author*494ity to revoke a license to practice medicine and surgery for unprofessional or dishonorable conduct, subject however to the right of appeal as provided in the statute. Section 4738, L. O. L. By Section 4734, L. O. L., the term “unprofessional or dishonorable conduct” is declared to mean, among other things, the procuring, or aiding and abetting in procuring, a criminal abortion. It is said, in Section 4735, L. O. L., that:
“Before a license can be revoked by said board for unprofessional or dishonorable conduct under the provisions of this act…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. GlassOregon Supreme Court · 1873
- State v. GrayOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- McKay v. FreemanOregon Supreme Court · 1877
- Parrish v. ParrishOregon Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by9 opinions
- State of Oregon v. BuckOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Abrams v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Lanterman v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Dyment v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Board of Medical Examiners v. BuckOregon Supreme Court · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.