Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Alton, 88079 (5-3-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 2007No. 88079Published

1Dissent

BOYLE, M.J., J.

{¶ 49} While I agree with the majority opinion regarding Alton's second, third, and fourth assignments of error, I respectfully dissent with respect to Alton's first assignment of error.

{¶ 50} In his first assignment, Alton argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress because the "affiant officer [Escalante] was not a legally and duly sworn police officer" for the city of Westlake.

{¶ 51} The majority summarizes Alton's argument, and then without any reference to this court's standard of review on a motion to suppress, states: "[t]his claim ignores the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. FanningOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. McNamaraOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Bardo v. City of LyndhurstOhio Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API