Heinlen v. Heilbron
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Action to quiet title. The plaintiff claims title to the lands in question by virtue of certain patents issued to him by the state of California, and the defendants claim that the lands are included within the boundaries of the Rancho Laguna de Tache, of which they are the owners. The lands in question were listed and patented to the state of California by the United States as a portion of the swamp and overflowed lands granted by the act of Congress of September 28, 1850, while the patent for the Rancho Laguna de Tache was issued upon a grant made by the Mexican government in January, 1846,…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Waer v. WaerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Meyer v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Colton Land & Water Co. v. SwartzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Hebrew Home for Aged Disabled v. FriedmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Steele v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.