Hebrew Home for Aged Disabled v. Friedman
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, refusing an application for a transfer of all the matters and proceedings in the estate of a deceased person to another department of the Superior Court. Thomas F. Graham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Houghton & Houghton, and Sullivan & Sullivan and Theo. J. Roche, for Appellant. Charles W. Slack, for Respondent, Hebrew Home for Aged Disabled.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, refusing an application for a transfer of all the matters and proceedings in the estate of a deceased person to another department of the Superior Court. Thomas F. Graham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Houghton & Houghton, and Sullivan & Sullivan and Theo. J. Roche, for Appellant. Charles W. Slack, for Respondent, Hebrew Home for Aged Disabled. Marshall B. Woodworth, for Respondent, Edward R. Lande, Executor. Edmund Tauszky, for Respondent, I. M. Friedberg, Executor. D. Friedenrich,…
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
In the probate court of the city and county of San Francisco, Honorable Thomas F. Graham presiding, and in the matter of the estate of Julius Friedman, deceased, application was made under section 170 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for a transfer of all the matters and proceedings in said estate to another department of the superior court. The motion was denied and from the order denying it this appeal is taken.
Julius Friedman died testate in 1900 and his will was duly admitted to probate. The inventory value of his estate in that year was four hundred and sixty-six thousand dollars, and it…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ruggles v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- State ex rel. Lefebvre v. CliffordWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Swan v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Mackay v. MackayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- N.Y. Institution for the Blind v. . How's Ex'rs.New York Court of Appeals · 1854
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Estate of HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Kreling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McEwen v. Occidental Life Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Jack Farenbaugh & Son v. Belmont Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.