Meyer v. City of San Diego
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County refusing to change the place -of trial. - E. S. Torrance, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
The plaintiff instituted an action against the city of San Diego, and against the Southern California Mountain. Water Company, for the twofold purpose: 1. Of setting aside as illegal and void a contract between the city and the water company defendant, involving an expenditure of one million five hundred thousand dollars of the moneys of the city to be obtained by the sale of its bonds; and 2. To enjoin the issuance and sale of the bonds to carry out the contract.
The bond issue had been voted at a special election called under an ordinance submitting to the electors the proposition ;of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Oakley v. . AspinwallNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Pearce v. AtwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
- Sauls v. FreemanSupreme Court of Florida · 1888
- Stockwell v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Commonwealth v. RyanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- City of Valdosta v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
- City of Oakland v. Pacific Coast Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- City of Oak Cliff v. State Ex Rel. GillTexas Supreme Court · 1904
- Hall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.